459 replies to this topic

[BeefJeRKy]

Camille, on 31 Jul 2009, 17:45, said:

an actual compelling, non-repetitive story?

^^THIS. Kane's story has been repetitively milked and we STILL know nothing about him. PLEASE end this well EA.

[Kichō]

Scope, on 31 Jul 2009, 23:41, said:

Camille, on 31 Jul 2009, 17:45, said:

an actual compelling, non-repetitive story?

STILL know nothing about him. PLEASE end this well EA.

Yes we do, its just some of you people not paying attention, what I'm curious about Kane is how he survives a Ion Cannon strike.

By the way, Tiberium was going to carry on the events after C&C3 and you could of seen a OLDER Kane.

[Gen.Kenobi]

So..please invent a Tiberium Universe without Kane. I'll glady hear it.

[Kichō]

Gen.Kenobi, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:01, said:

So..please invent a Tiberium Universe without Kane. I'll glady hear it.

...Thats not going to happen, without Kane whats the point.

[Gen.Kenobi]

so...no more Tiberium.

[Kichō]

I mean if there was going to be a story without Kane it wouldn't make sense...

[Gen.Kenobi]

That's what i said : There's no Tiberium Universe without Kane.

[Brad]

Zhen, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:02, said:

Gen.Kenobi, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:01, said:

So..please invent a Tiberium Universe without Kane. I'll glady hear it.

...Thats not going to happen, without Kane whats the point.

The end of one of the games (can't rember which) pretty much says that he clones himself.

[Gen.Kenobi]

So...wanting or not IF he clones himself, he'll keep existing as well the tiberium universe.

PS: Brad wouldn1t be StarWars expanded universe where before dying Palpative cloned himself?

[Kichō]

Brad, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:12, said:

Zhen, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:02, said:

Gen.Kenobi, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:01, said:

So..please invent a Tiberium Universe without Kane. I'll glady hear it.

...Thats not going to happen, without Kane whats the point.

The end of one of the games (can't rember which) pretty much says that he clones himself.

Firestorm, and no he didnt clone himself the 'tubes' were made by CABAL which healed Kanes wounds (at first I thought he was cloned but hes not) In KW you'll notice that since he wears the faceplate which continues FS's plotline.

[Gen.Kenobi]

So...Tiberium without Kane is equal to no Tiberium Universe.

No Kane, no Nod, No Nod, no GDI, no Tiberium.

Peharps they would create Kane's son.

[Brad]

Zhen, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:15, said:

Brad, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:12, said:

Zhen, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:02, said:

Gen.Kenobi, on 1 Aug 2009, 0:01, said:

So..please invent a Tiberium Universe without Kane. I'll glady hear it.

...Thats not going to happen, without Kane whats the point.

The end of one of the games (can't rember which) pretty much says that he clones himself.

Firestorm, and no he didnt clone himself the 'tubes' were made by CABAL which healed Kanes wounds (at first I thought he was cloned but hes not) In KW you'll notice that since he wears the faceplate which continues FS's plotline.

It always looked like cloning to me, oh well, my mistake I suppose.

[BeefJeRKy]

Why can't Tiberium go on without Kane? All they need is a good enough excuse. Technically Kane could have died and someone else lead NOD against GDI. We've only tied Kane so much to the Tiberium series because he is such an iconic figure but unfortunately he is stifling the creativity of the story. And Zhen, there isn't much of Kane's orgin talked about in any of the games I believe. How did he come to power initially? How old is he? Is he actually a descendent of Cain, the Biblical figure? etc...

edit: epic typo

Edited by Scope, 31 July 2009 - 23:43.

[Amdrial]

Also; does anyone know about the continuity flaw regarding the rather very horribly unstable state of the Tacitus at the end of Kane's Wrath and the almost pristine state at the start of C&C4?
I thought the thing was about to go boom, not to mention irrepairable, and they managed to repair it to it's original condition still? Remember the ending of Kane's Wrath where Kane ''feeds'' the Tacitus to Legion? I thought it would kindof like, well you know, made the Tacitus disappear or something.
I think EA just tripped over its own legs there, once again.

Edit: Scope... ''the Boblical figure?''

Edited by Amdrial, 31 July 2009 - 23:37.

[Gen.Kenobi]

And that's why they are f**king with C&C4

[Golan]

Amdrial, on 31 Jul 2009, 23:35, said:

Also; does anyone know about the continuity flaw regarding the rather very horribly unstable state of the Tacitus at the end of Kane's Wrath and the almost pristine state at the start of C&C4?
I thought the thing was about to go boom, not to mention irrepairable, and they managed to repair it to it's original condition still? Remember the ending of Kane's Wrath where Kane ''feeds'' the Tacitus to Legion? I thought it would kindof like, well you know, made the Tacitus disappear or something.
I think EA just tripped over its own legs there, once again.

In the last KW mission, the Tacitus only goes critical because GDI is handling it improperly in their efforts to crack it. It's not permanently damaged unless you fail the mission and GDI manages to blow it up.

[Gen.Kenobi]

BTW:



Looks like C&C4 will have ONLINE SP...what a mess...EA just screw everything!

[MentalAss]

Quote

EA just screw everything!

No no no, as Killeratte once put it, EA Games, fuck up everything.

I was pondering on putting aside my boycott and dislike of EA in an effort to see the conclusion of my favourite RTS series, but after the announcement no bases and online single player...yeah.

[Kichō]

Before you go around bashing them I suggest you do your research, Apoc said they might allow you to play the campaign without having a online connection and there is base building through the defence class.

[Sgt. Rho]

Camille, on 31 Jul 2009, 16:45, said:

an actual compelling, non-repetitive story?

True... until now, hasn't it been most always been like...

Nod - ATTAAAAAAAACKK!!!!!1111111
GDI - HOLY SHIT NODS BACK!!1111elf
*kane misteriously ressucites*
Nod - MUAHAH WE OWN YOU
GDI - commander, we need you
*Nod gets its ass seved on a platter*
Nod - *cry*
GDI - YAY!
Kane dies.
repeat.

Edited by Sgt. Rho, 01 August 2009 - 19:43.

[Golan]

Gen.Kenobi, on 1 Aug 2009, 19:15, said:

BTW:

*picture*

Looks like C&C4 will have ONLINE SP...what a mess...EA just screw everything!

Oh noez, they changed it now they suck.

So it's not a true CNC (whatever that means), that doesn't make it a bad game. The SP limitations aren't exactly a new phenomenon either and are being reevaluated. If you want to flame them, then do so in a way that actually makes sense and isn't just random nagging.

[RaiDK]

You're all starting to sound like a broken record.

[BeefJeRKy]

Yeah EA bashing is tiresome. They make awesome games, just that the C&C series has had less than spectacular developement.

[Camille]

maybe because "true c&c fans" are so damn picky about every god damn thing that isn't more or less exactly ripped from the first few titles (TD, RA).

[Gen.Kenobi]

It can't change the fact that EA is destroying classics.